What action can help mitigate the risks associated with groupthink?

Monitoring the degree of consensus and disagreement is a pivotal action to mitigate the risks associated with groupthink. Groupthink often occurs in highly cohesive groups that prioritize harmony and conformity over critical thinking and individual expressions of dissent. By actively monitoring both consensus and disagreement, a group can ensure that different perspectives are considered, which helps to foster an environment where diverse ideas are encouraged and evaluated critically. This approach promotes open communication and can lead to better decision-making outcomes.

High cohesion without interaction with outside groups can reinforce groupthink by further isolating the group from diverse perspectives, while a leader stating their opinion early may suppress dissenting views and discourage open dialogue among group members. Limiting organizational controls might reduce the accountability necessary for effective decision-making and could inadvertently contribute to an environment where groupthink thrives.